NOW RECRUITING · Survey of Current and Former Workers and Volunteers in Animal-Related Fields: Moral, Emotional, and Relational Experiences in Animal-Connected Work

Your experience is the data.

Take the survey by clicking below


Almost there!

Please confirm you're a real person to continue to the FortifyU survey.

If this shows an error after you check the box, no need to worry — it will automatically recheck and clear itself within a few seconds.

A new cross-sector study is documenting psychological well-being, moral injury, perpetration, and attrition across every kind of animal-connected work: shelter and rescue, veterinary medicine, animal control, farm animal and equine rescue, laboratory and research, wildlife and conservation, zoo and aquarium, animal search-and-rescue and k-9, companion animal services, pet cremation and aftercare, investigation and legal advocacy and media, breeding, and food systems. If you currently work or volunteer (or have in the past) in a field where animals are a central aspect of your work, your experience belongs in this research.


This research is supported by a research grant from Growing Kindness LTD.

This study has been reviewed and approved by Pearl IRB 2026-0365. Participation is voluntary, responses are anonymous, and you may stop at any time. Questions about the study can be directed to Dr. Jamie McNally at info@fortifyucoaching.com


WHO CAN TAKE PART

Anyone who works or has worked in an animal-related field, paid or volunteer, in any sector and any country that can complete a survey in English.

WHAT IT INVOLVES

One anonymous online survey, about 15-25 minutes. No identifying information required.

WHY IT MATTERS

The results shape how organizations are asked to change — and what support the field can demand. Findings will contribute to resource development to support the mental health and well-being of individuals working with animals in various sectors.

THE WORK

A different premise about the suffering.

For two decades, the distress of animal care workers has been talked about in ways that largely locates the problem inside the worker and asks them, essentially, to cope better. The research at Fortifyu starts somewhere else, with a different premise: that much of this suffering is moral injury, the wound that forms when people who entered this work to protect animals are placed in conditions that force them to participate in, witness, or fail to prevent harm.

Fortifyu has been a pioneer in bringing attention to moral injury in animal care. Its research program tests, empirically, how that injury appears, where it actually comes from, how it differs from burnout, secondary traumatic stress, and compassion fatigue, and which conditions inside organizations make it more or less likely. The findings point consistently outward toward: public hostility, institutional betrayal, and the structure of the work itself, rather than toward any deficiency in the people doing it.

It is rigorous science, held to peer review. It is also written to be read by the people it is about.

ORIGINAL CONTRIBUTIONS

The ideas this work introduced.


❋ FRAMEWORK

The MIRA Framework

Moral injury understood through four integrated domains:

Moral, Identity, Relational, and Agency.

Injury occurs when this system is disrupted: a moral code is violated, identity is threatened, relational bonds are severed, and the capacity to act — agency — is constrained.


❋ NEW TERM

Morally saturated environments

A name for workplaces where moral stakes are not occasional but constant — where nearly every task carries the possibility of moral compromise, and exposure becomes chronic rather than acute.


❋ MODEL

The three-layer pathway

Outcomes are shaped in sequence: organizational conditions set the exposure a worker meets, the type of exposure determines the kind of harm, and meaning-making capacity decides whether distress resolves or hardens into injury.

The MIRA framework — Moral, Identity, Relational, and Agency domains surrounding moral functioning. Disruption across these domains is what distinguishes moral injury from burnout.


❋ DISTINCTION

The agency wound

What separates moral injury from complex trauma: avoidance in moral injury is often other-protective rather than self-protective, and the loss of voice and choice — agency — is a wound in its own right, not a symptom of something else.

PUBLICATIONS

The findings, on the record.

PEER-REVIEWED


Published

McNally J (2026) Moral injury in animal care workers: prevalence, pathways, and phenomenology in a cross-sector sample. Front. Psychiatry 17:1820899. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2026.1820899


In Review

  In Review
  Preprint

Distinguishing moral injury from burnout, secondary traumatic stress, and depression in animal care workers

Moral injury in animal care workers: prevalence, pathways, and phenomenology in a cross-sector sample


Locating Organizational Stressors in Animal Care Work: A Cross-Sector Survey

The MIRA framework for moral injury: A moral, identity, relational, and agency model applied across helping professions